← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3917/2019disposed

Kamlesh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-07Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3917 of 2019 ====================================================== Kamlesh Thakur (Male) aged about 54 years, Son of Late Bhola Thakur, Resident of Village-Baheri, West Police Station-Baheri, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Excise Department at Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga, Division, Darbhanga. 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga. 4.

The Officer in Charge, Baheri Police Station, District Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramashankar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish (SC5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the Baheri P.S. Case No. 135 of 2018 has been instituted for allegedly violating the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 on the alleged recovery of liquor from the house of the petitioner but the fact is that the house has neither been confiscated nor put under seal. However, he submits that the institution of the criminal case has led to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3917 of 2019 dt.07-03-2019 2/2 confiscation proceeding bearing Confiscation Proceeding No. 216 of 2018.

In our opinion, if the house of the petitioner from where the recovery of liquor has allegedly been made, has not been put under seizure, he does not have a cause of action at this stage. The petitioner nonetheless would be at liberty to raise all issues as raised herein to contest the confiscation case before the prescribed authority.

With the observation above, the writ application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.03.2019 Transmission Date NA