Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7883/2026bail granted

Ravi Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7883 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1147 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ravi Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar S/O Manjay Lal Singh R/O VillageMirzanagar, P.S- Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 1147 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 108 litres of liquor has been recovered from bathaan.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7883 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 from an open place which is accessible to public at large. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 13.12.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 1147 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T