← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18957/2021rejected

Devraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-04-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18957 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2020 Thana- PARBATTA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Devraj Singh, Son Of Late Bibhakar Singh Resident Of Village- Jamunia, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Sailendra Singh @ Sallo Singh, Son Of Murlidhar Singh Resident Of Village- Jamunia, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Bhagalpur 3.

Yogendra Singh @ Jago Singh, Son Of Murlidhar Singh Resident Of Village- Jamunia, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2021 Heard both sides.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Parbatta P. S. Case No.72 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 324, 325, 307 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The informant alleged that the petitioners having armed with different weapons came and assaulted the informant. They also fired to kill the informant. Raushan Singh got injury. The informant brought Raushan Singh to the hospital. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no specific allegation is made against the petitioners, but it appears

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18957 of 2021(2) dt.05-04-2021 2/2 that all the petitioners having armed with different weapons assaulted Raushan Kumar Singh and petitioner no.2 Shailendra Singh is said to have fired. It appears from perusal of Paragraph3 of the bail petition that the petitioners have got criminal antecedents and they are accused in as many as seven criminal cases.

Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail and the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) vikash/- U T