Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7605 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

MEENA DEVI W/o Ganesh Prasad Mahto @ Ganesh Prasad Mahton Resident of Village - Sujanpur, P.s.- Gadpur, Dsitt.- Begusarai. 2.

ANJU DEVI W/o Brajkishor Mahto @ Brajkishor Mahton Resident of Village - Sujanpur, P.s.- Gadpur, Dsitt.- Begusarai. 3.

SONU KUMAR Son of Brajkishor Mahto @ Braj Kishor Mahto Resident of Village - Sujanpur, P.s.- Gadpur, Dsitt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

KHUSBOON KUMARI D/o Nunulal Mahto Resident of Village - Dhaudahi Ward no.11, P.s.- Khonawanpur (Dhaudahi O.P.) Dsitt.- Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that during the pendency of this anticipatory bail application, petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have been arrested and, as such, the same has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application as against petitioner nos 2 and 3.

In view of the aforesaid submission, the application is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7605 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 2/3 dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous as against petitioner nos. 2 and 3.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, the learned APP for the State.

Petitioner no. 1 apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498, 504, 506 and 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Sections 366, 494, 379, 323 and 34 of the IPC were added, registered in connection with Begusarai Mahila P.S.Case No. 31 of 2021.

As per allegation, co-accused Saurav Kumar on the pretext of marriage, developed physical relation with the informant, but later on he refused to marry her. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner no.1 Meena Devi is the aunt of the main accused Sarurav Kumar. There is no allegation at all against her in the entire FIR. She is a lady of clean antecedent. Considering the above facts and circumstances, let petitioner no. 1 above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7605 of 2022(2) dt.22-07-2022 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusari Mahila P.S.case No. 31 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T