Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11829/2024bail rejected

Ramjanam Ravidas @ Rohit Kumar Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-01Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11829 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2023 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramjanam Ravidas @ Rohit Kumar Ravidas Son Of Hulash Ravidas Resident Of Village-Usari Toli, Shekhar Bigha, P.S.-Buniyadganj, Dist-Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anmol Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Buniyadganj P.S Case No. 246 of 2023 from the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, (J.M.F.C), Gaya registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 506 of I.P.C

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with co-accused assaulted the informant's husband and other family members with garasa due to which her husband sustained cut injury on his ear, fracture injury to other family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11829 of 2024(2) dt.01-03-2024 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 26.11.2023.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. In view of the allegation as there is direct allegation against the petitioner, injury corroborates with the allegation as one injury is simple and other is grievous in nature this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Hence, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to conclude the trial within the period of six months from the receipt of this order, if the trial is not concluded within aforesaid period then trial court shall grant bail to the petitioner. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T