Nand Kumar Dixit And ORS v. The Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank Through Its Chairman And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17315 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Nand Kumar Dixit Son of Late Hardeo Singh resident of Mohalla - Miscot, Lane No. 6, Behind Jubba Sahni Park, Post - Ramna, District - Muzaffarpur - 842002.

2. Mahesh Prasad Singh Son of Late Girija Nandan Prasad resident of Reva Road, Pharda Gola, Patahi Jagarnath, Marwan, District - Muzaffarpur - 843113.

3. Umesh Kumar Vibhu Son of Late Duryodhan Prasad Singh resident of Village + Post - Baligaon, Baligaon Chandrapura Buzurg, Patepur, District - Vaishali.

4. Ramnendra Singh Son of Late Ram Chandra Singh resident of Sri Krishna Nagar, Near Aryan Public School, Gobarsahi, Khabra Urf Kiratpur, Gurdas, District - Muzaffarpur - 843146.

5. Brajmohan Prasad Son of Late Lakhi Chand Sah resident of Rampur Kesho Urf Malahi, District - Muzaffarpur - 843126.

6. Shobhna Verma wife of Anant Kumar Verma resident of Dutta Compound, Near Prabhat Puri, Maripur, District - Muzaffarpur - 842001.

7. Arun Kumar Ganguly Son of Brojo Raj Ganguly resident of Ward No. 25, Amgola Bihari Bhawan, Mushari, Ramna, Muzaffarpur - 842002.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank through its Chairman, Head Office - Kamalbagh Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

2. The General Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, its Head Office at Kalambagh Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Chief Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Muzaffarpur, Head Office - Kalambagh Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Regional Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Muzaffarpur, Head Office - Kalambagh Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chakrapani For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents are in agreement that the present writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 11.01.2016 passed in L.P.A. No. 1701 of 2015.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17315 of 2017(2) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 Since there is no dispute about the present case being covered by the aforesaid judgment dated 11.01.2016, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 11.01.2016 passed in L.P.A. No. 1701 of 2015. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U