Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7420 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2023 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Raju Kumar son of Late Bacchu Sah @ Bachchu Saw Resident of Village - Naya Tola kazipur Pipal, Ps- Kadamkuan, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 22.08.2025. It is next submitted that informant alleges that Bablu Sahni @ Govind Sahni fired at his brother causing firearm injury but then the doctor declared the brother of the informant dead.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of firing is against Bablu Sahni.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7420 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026 2/3 It is also submitted that Rahul Ray had approached this Court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.77295 of 2023 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 05.12.2023, thereafter Sahil also approached this court seeking regular bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.5192 of 2025 and the same also was allowed by an order dated 24.03.2025. Learned counsel thus based on parity seeks bail for the petitioner. It is also submitted that if privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.50 of 2023.
7. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the framing of charge or after framing of charge is trying to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7420 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026 3/3 delay the trial, in both the conditions, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T