Patna High CourtCWJC/14865/2017disposed

Ashok Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14865 of 2017 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Sarvanand Singh, R/o Village- Chilbili, P.S. Beur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Teacher Employed Appellate Authority Patna through its Secretary.

5. The District Magistrate, Patna, District- Patna.

6. The District Education Officer, Patna, District- Patna.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna, District- Patna.

8. The Block Development Officer Punpun, Block- Punpun, District- Patna.

9. The Block Education Officer, Punpun, Block- Punpun, District- Patna.

10. The Panchayat Teacher Employment Unit, Gram Panchayat Raj- Parthu, Block- Punpun, District- Patna.

11. The Panchayat Sevak-cum-Secretary Panchayat Teacher Employment Committee, Gram Panchayat Raj- Parthu, Block- Punpun, District- Patna.

12. The Mukhiya-cum-Chairman, Panchayat Teacher Employment Committee-Parthu, Block- Punpun, District- Patna.

13. Amrendra Kumar S/o Late Bijli Thakur, R/o Village- Tikarichak, P.S.- Pipra, District- Patna, posted at Government Primary School Pipra Harijan, P.S.- Pipra, District- Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.C.Mishra -Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that alternative remedy in the nature of appeal to the District Appellate Authority is available and as such this application may be permitted to be

Patna High Court CWJC No.14865 of 2017 (2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 withdrawn in order to enable the counsel for the petitioner to approach District Teachers Appellate Authority. Permission is accorded.

In case, the petitioner files appeal before the District Teachers Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority will decide the case on its own merit after condoning the delay, if any. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U