← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/832/2018withdrawn

Rajeshwar Rai @ Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.832 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajeshwar Rai @ Ray, Son of Nawal Kishore Rai, resident of VillageKabirpur, Post Office- Singhwalia, Police Station- Mohammadpur, DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

4. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Gopalganj.

6. The Block Education Officer, Baikunthpur Block, District- Gopalganj.

7. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Hakam, Block- Baikunthpur, DistrictGopalganj.

8. Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Hakam, Block- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

9. Presiding Officer, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj.

10. Kamleshwar Prasad, Son of late Chandradeo Prasad, resident of VillageHajipur, Ward No. 28, Post Officer, Police Station and DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey -Aag15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2018 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the State Appellate Authority. Permission is accorded.

In case, the appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is expected to decide the appeal on

Patna High Court CWJC No.832 of 2018 (2) dt.16-03-2018 2/2 its own merit after condoning the delay in view of the fact that the petitioner was perusing his remedy before this Court. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U