Chanchal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13235 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-666 Year-2023 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== CHANCHAL KUMAR S/o Shashi Bindu Singh Resident of Village-Abgila, P.S.-Chandradip, District-Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.666 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 406, 379, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(CC), 66(CD) of the I.T. Act. 3.

Allegation against the petitioner is to have cheated the people during providing loan from Bajaj finance and there is recovery of mobile, debit cards, SIM, etc. 4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that alleged recovery was not made from conscious physical possession of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13235 of 2024(2) dt.01-03-2024 2/2 the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and he is in custody since 01.11.2023. 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. In view of the allegation and as a lot of material recovered from the possession of this petitioner, which were used in the offence under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code and 66(CC), 66(CD) of the I.T. Act, where, this case is related to cyber crime, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, at present.

7.

However, learned Trial Court is directed to the trial conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of 06 (six) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail, if trial would not conclude within specified period and further learned trial court is directed to consider the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) S.Katyayan/- U T