Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9744/2023rejected

Dinesh Rajvanshi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9744 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2022 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Dinesh Rajvanshi S/O Ramadhar Rajvanshi R/V- Gachhai, P.S.- Karakat Gorari, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that two motorcycle borne criminals robbed the bag of the informant on pistol point which was containing cash of Rs. 3.5 lakhs. During snatching the bag, the Aadhar card of one of the miscreants fell on the ground which was of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence and he has not been put on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9744 of 2023(3) dt.04-05-2023 2/2 TIP. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2022.

In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner and submitted that Aadhar card of the petitioner was seized from the place of occurrence and subsequently the cash of Rs. 3.5 lakhs was also recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has criminal antecedents and he is accused in three other cases apart from the present one.

Considering the facts aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T