← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41829/2014bail granted

Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-21Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41829 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -269 Year- 2014 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav Son of Jawahar Yadav Resident of Village- BalaThakur, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the nature of offence under sections 363, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and the fact that the petitioner has not been named in 164 Cr.P.C. statement nor has got any criminal antecedent, this Court by taking into account that he has also been in custody since 6.6.2014 would direct for release of the petitioner, Sanjay Yadav, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Uma Shankar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in Naubatpur P.S.Case No. 269/2014, subject to the following conditions:

(i) That both the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how they are related with the petitioner. The bailors will

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41829 of 2014 (3) dt.21-01-2015 also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

(iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on the date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date of trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled on this ground alone.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) surendra/- U