Sudama Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6839 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Sudama Singh , son of late Yogi Singh @ Late Yogendra Singh

2. Harihar Singh, son of Late Rameshwar Singh @ Rajeshwar Singh, both are Assistant teacher (primary unit) of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School, Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O. Bakhari, P.S. Patahi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Special Director (Secondary Education), Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Bihar, Patna

4. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Education Board, Bihar, Patna

5. The District Education Officer, East Champaran

6. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), East Champaran

7. The Managing Committee of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School, Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O. Bakhari, P.S. Patahi, District- East Champaran through its Secretary

8. The Headmaster of Ayodhya Shiv Narayan Sanskrit High School, Bhitargharwa Muthh, P.O. Bakhari, P.S. Patahi, District- East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar, AC to GP-20 For BSSB :

Mr. S.S.Sundaram, Advocate Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 13-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by the decision of Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 715 of 2000 and CWJC No. 7729 of 1998, contained in Annexures 5 and 6. Considering the submission advanced by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6839 of 2018(2) dt.13-04-2018 2/2 petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Special Director, Respondent No. 2 to examine the claim of the petitioners in the light of the orders contained in Annexures 5 and 6 to the writ petition and the recent judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Sanskrit Schools. Final decision in this regard must be taken by the respondent No. 2 within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U