← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10309/2026allowed

Manoj Kumar Mandal @ Munnu Mandal @ Mannu Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-10Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10309 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2024 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Mandal @ Munnu Mandal @ Mannu Mandal S/O Late Shiv Mandal R/O Vill.- Shankarpur, P.S- Sabour, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate Mr. Shashi Skekhar Shandilya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown accused persons have committed murder of the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10309 of 2026(4) dt.10-04-2026 2/3 miscreants. During the course of the investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, Abhishek Kumar @ Visheshwar. He further submits that save and except the confessional statement of the co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner. In the entire record of the case, there is no eyewitness of the occurrence. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the recovery, if any, has been made on the disclosure of co-accused, Abhishek Kumar. He further submits that similarly situated other co-accused have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 88083 of 2024 and 15695 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10309 of 2026(4) dt.10-04-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-XI, Bhagalpur in connection with Sabour P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024 and S.T. No. 01 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T