Yogendra Yadav @ Jogendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8699 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2024 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Yogendra Yadav @ Jogendra Yadav S/O Late Ranglal Yadav R/O - Jagdishpur, P.S.-Vijaipur, District-Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satyendra Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard Mr.Satyendra Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No.114 of 2024, dated 06.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323,341,307,324,504/34 of IPC.
3. As per FIR, prosecution case is that on 03.06.2024 at about 9.00 PM, informant and her husband was sleeping then suddenly Yogendra Yadav (brother-in-law of informant) alongwith 3-4 unknown persons attacked her husband with weapon. Her husband got injury on head.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the informant is sister-in-law of the petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8699 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 due to some petty dispute, the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the husband of the informant, who happens to be the brother of the petitioner. Although he has received injury but the injury report of the husband of the informant suggests that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner has clean antecedent and injury inflicted upon the injury person is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No.114 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8699 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T