Asharfi Giri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14629 of 2017 ====================================================== Asharfi Giri, S/o Late Sobaran Giri, resident of Village- Ashopur, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

3. The Director District Rural Development Authority, Sheohar.

4. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheohar.

5. The Executive Engineer, P.H.ED.

6. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Son of Sheo Mangal Singh, resident of VillageBairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

7. Rubi Devi, W/o Sanja Shekhar, resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar (Present Mukhiya).

8. Sanjay Shekhar @ Shashi Singh, S/o Shiv Shankar Singh, resident of VillageBairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

9. Rajeev Kumar, Son of Shiv Shankar Singh, resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

10. Rajnish Kumar, Son of Arun Kumar, resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

11. Shatrudhan Rai, Son of Ram Narayan Rai, resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S.- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anjani Kumar - AAG-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 18-04-2018 In the matter of constructions made under the Swachha Bharat Mission Gramin and Lohiya Swachhata Scheme and the irregularities conducted in the matter, we are satisfied from the counter affidavit filed and the inquiry conducted by the State Government, as is evident from the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14629 of 2017 dt.18-04-2018 2/2 Inquiry Report filed as Annexure-A dated 08.09.2017. A detailed inquiry has been conducted into the matter and the report indicates that all action, as is permissible under law for implementation of the scheme in question, which is a nonstatutory scheme, has been undertaken by the State Government and, therefore, now, we are not inclined to go into any such issue involved in the matter.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.04.2018 Transmission Date