Harishchandra Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11769 of 2016 ====================================================== Harishchandra Singh son of Late Tufani Singh, Resident of Village- Barej, P.O.- Kauree Ram, P.S. Mohaniya, Distict Kaimur, Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India 2.
The Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi. null null 3.
The National Highways Authority of India through its Chairman-cumSecretary, Ministry of Shipping 4.
The Project Director, National Highway Authority, D.I.G. Colony, Maqbool Alam Road, Varanasi U.P.
5.
The District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Kaimur at Bhabua.
6.
The Additional Collector- cum- Arbitration, Kamiur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, AC to GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
"for setting aside the order dated 21.3.15 passed in Misc. Case No. 285/2014-15 by A.D.M.-cum-Arbitrator, Kaimur at Bhabua whereby and where under the learned Arbitrator has rejected the claim of the petitioner to
Patna High Court CWJC No.11769 of 2016(2) dt.21-07-2025 2/2 calculate the value of acquired land in dispute at the rate of commercial in place of residential. And/or pass such any other order/orders which the court thinks the petitioner entitled for."
3. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has come before this Court against the order passed by the Arbitrator and the natural course should have been approach the civil court under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
4. Though the petitioner is not present, granting said liberty to follow the section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U