← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2292/2020disposed

Manohar Kumar Manmohan, v. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited

2021-12-22Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta,Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2292 of 2020 ====================================================== Manohar Kumar Manmohan, Aged about 41 years (M) Son of Deo Narayan Singh, Resident of Mohalla-J.P. Nagar, Janta Chowk Purnea, Post Office Purnea, Police Station K. Hat, District- Purnea, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Indian Oil Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, Indian Oil Bhawan G-9, All Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East Mumbai, Maharashtra. 2.

The Managing Director, Indian Oil Bhawan G-9, All Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East Mumbai, Maharashtra.

3.

The Head of Divisional Office, Begusarai Divisional Office Indian Oil Corporation Limited (M.D.), Near Barauni Refinery Police Station, DistrictBegusarai, Bihar. 4.

The CDRSM, Begusarai Divisional Office Indian Oil Corporation Limited (M.D.), Near Barauni Refinery Police Station, District- Begusarai, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranvijay Narain Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) Date : 22-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is aggrieved by allotment of the petrol outlet to a candidate who has been successful in the draw of lots. According to him, earlier his name was being considered and he had deposited some requisite amount with the Indian Oil Corporation.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2292 of 2020 dt.22-12-2021 2/2 At the outset, a query has been put to learned counsel whether there is an internal mechanism available with the Corporation to consider such a plea as raised by the petitioner, the Court has been apprised that a Grievance Redressal Mechanism is in place and is fully functional. We propose to relegate the petitioner to the said mechanism, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection.

The petition is, thus, disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to appear before the Grievance Redressal Authority which shall afford an opportunity of hearing to him and take a decision within two weeks. It is made clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation/ complaint within one week from today which shall be decided within two weeks, thereafter. Till then, status quo regarding the outlet becoming functional shall be maintained.

(Rajan Gupta, J) (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date