Shweta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12598 of 2016 ====================================================== Shweta Kumari Wife of Babu Saheb Rajak Resident of VillagePanchayatSonha, East Ward No. 1 P.S Sahebpur Kamal District Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Director, Integrated Child Development Service I.C.D.S. Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Programme Officer, Begusarai , Bihar. 4.
The Child Development Project Officer, Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ansul For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha- Gp22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the summer vacations as learned counsel for the petitioner was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.
The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May, 2019, published prior to the vacation. The matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the court for disposal of the matter.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondents-State.
It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was denied selection though she was valid candidate
Patna High Court CWJC No.12598 of 2016(2) dt.22-05-2019 2/2 for selection in the process for selection of Anganbari sevika at Mini Anganbari Center no. 176. It is further submitted that from the center SC/ST category candidate was to be appointed/ selected but candidate belonging to OBC category has been appointed. It is alleged that selection was on the basis of extraneous consideration. It is submitted that against selection of candidate, petitioner would approach the appropriate authority under the guideline with her grievance in respect of selection in question.
In view of such submissions, this court only observes that authority concerned would examine the issue in accordance with law after hearing the parties.
Writ petition is disposed off.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U