Abdul Jabbar Mansuri v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4375 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Abdul Jabbar Mansuri S/o Late Md. Khairul Haq, resident of VillageMadhura Dakshin, Ward No. 8, P.O. and P.S. Narpatganj, District- Araria. 2.
Umesh Rai, S/o Late Bachhalal Rai, resident of Village and P.S. Narpatganj, District- Araria.
3.
Shashi Bhushan Kumar Dubey, S/o Shri Nityanand Dubey, resident of Village- Amarpur, P.O. and P.S. Amarpur, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Commissioner- cum-Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Director, Mass Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The District Education Officer, Araria.
6.
The District Education Officer, Banka.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (Gp23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 22-03-2024 No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the State is present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.). and
Patna High Court CWJC No.4375 of 2020(2) dt.22-03-2024 2/2 the same may be disposed off accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."
3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U