Pankaj Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9463 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2025 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== 1.
Pankaj Singh S/O Kamdeo Singh Resident of Village- Charaun Nauwagarhi, P.S- Muffasil, Distt.- Munger.
2.
Rajesh Kumar @ Mukhia S/O Kamdeo Singh Resident of Village- Charaun Nauwagarhi, P.S- Muffasil, Distt.- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his father on 14.10.2025 objected the construction of road as water was flowing towards his house, when accused persons came and Chandan assaulted him by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on head and when his father and brother came to save him, the accused Anil, Rajesh and Pankaj assaulted them causing injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9463 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/2 informant, it is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to construction of road, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the father and brother of the informant, but then allegation of assault is not specific.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 370 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T