Siddhi Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8371 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-652 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

SIDDHI THAKUR SON OF LATE ARJUN THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEWANPURA, P.S.- TOWN KADIRGANJ (O.P.), DISTRICTNAWADA 2.

SEEMA DEVI WIFE OF SIDDHI THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGEDEWANPURA, P.S.- TOWN KADIRGANJ (O.P.), DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nawada Town (Kadirganj O.P) P.S. Case No. 652 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

The Court initially was inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners but then the learned APP for the State pointed out that though it has been pleaded in the anticipatory bail application that the petitioners are servant and maid and they work in Delhi in house of an engineer namely Videsh Ji but then the residential address has not been furnished in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8371 of 2022(3) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 anticipatory bail application as such the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.

Permission is accorded.

In the event, if the petitioners surrender before the learned trial court on or before 11.10.2022, the learned trial court shall dispose of the bail application on the same day if the petitioners furnish their residential address where they stay in Delhi and the learned trial court will also keep in mind the fact that the petitioners are aged people and are persons with clean antecedent and the alleged recovery is of a meager amount from their house where they don't stay presently.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T