Sunil Baheliya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40930 of 2014 Arising Out of P. S. Case No. -426 Year- 2014 Thana -SASARAM (Town) District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Sunil Baheliya, son of Ram Sakal Baheliya, resident of Mohalla:- Sagar, P. O: Sasaram, P.S.; Sasaram (Town), District- Rohtas .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Ray, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.N.Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 09-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner is to have demanded dowry and due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry Geeta Devi sister of the informant has been killed and her dead body has been disposed of.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was some altercation between the petitioner and his wife, deceased and thereafter she took poison. When the petitioner came to know he was taking the deceased to the hospital while she died in the way to the hospital.

Learned counsel for the State submits that there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40930 of 2014 (4) dt.09-03-2015 2/2 material in the case-diary to show that the deceased has been killed due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. After investigation charge-sheet has been submitted. Considering the facts and circumstances, in my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve bail at this stage. His prayer for bail is rejected.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T