Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10039/2026dismissed

Nitesh Kumar @ Nitin Kumar @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10039 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2021 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Nitesh Kumar @ Nitin Kumar @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh S/o Dev Lal Bhagat @ Deolal Prasad Kushwaha R/o Village- Barji, PS- Motipur, DistrictMuzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Preety Kunwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 206/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392, 397, 302 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, deceased after closing his shop was returning home when he was intercepted by three persons and they committed loot of a bag containing jewellery after killing him. The deceased is the father of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. It is next submitted that the looted articles were recovered from the co-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10039 of 2026(5) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 accused who had named the petitioner in his self-inculpatory statement. Learned counsel further submits that he has three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail and he is in custody since 23.05.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial and frame the charges at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T