← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10196/2023bail granted

Shiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-26Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10196 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SHIV KUMAR Son of Late Chandeshwar Ram Resident of VillageManiyari, P.S.- Kako, (Velawar O.P.), District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Siddharth Harsh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is alleged to have committed rape upon gotani of the informant.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute between the parties. He further submits that the allegation, as alleged in the F.I.R., is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence. He further submits that the victim was examined on the same date of occurrence i.e. 07.08.2022 but

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10196 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 2/3 the doctor has not found any internal or external injury or any sign of sexual assault on the person of the victim. Therefore, no case under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 10.11.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10196 of 2023(3) dt.26-06-2023 3/3 the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T