Nitish Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2412 of 2022 ====================================================== Nitish Kumar, son of Rajendra Singh, resident of Village-Ram Nagar Abgilla Manpur, P.S.-Manpur, District-Gaya, at present Assistant Teacher in Sanskrit High School Manikpur, P.O.-Tankuppa, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Director, Secondary Education, Incharge Sanskrit Education, Bihar, Patna, Department of Education, Vikash Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.

2.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary. 3.

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Education Officer, Gaya, District-Gaya. 6.

The District Programme Officer, Gaya, District-Gaya. 7.

The Headmaster, Sanskrit High School Manikpur Tankuppa, P.O.-Tankuppa, District-Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Kumar Ishwar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (Gp 27) For the B.S.S.B.

:

Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by the order passed in C.W.J.c. No.985 of 2015 dated 27.03.2019 and C.W.J.C. No.15299 of 2015 and analogous case.

3.

In such view of the matter, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the District Programme Officer,

Patna High Court CWJC No.2412 of 2022 dt.04-04-2024 2/2 Gaya (respondent no.6) along with all supporting judgments and documents within a period of two weeks and the respondent no.6 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4.

It is made clear that respondent no.6 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period. 5.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is hereby disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 05.04.2024 Transmission Date N.A.