Vivek Kumar @ Vivek Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10376 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Vivek Kumar @ Vivek raj son of Seth Rai Resident Of Vill- Botalkhana PsDanapur Distt. -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 627 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the marriage of the informant was solemnized in the year 2019 with one Manoj Kumar @ Jitendra. On 12.07.2024, when the husband of the informant was returning at 07:00 P.M., it is alleged that unknown miscreants have killed the husband of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10376 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner has been framed in this case on the basis of his criminal antecedents and after that he has given his confessional statement. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the occurrence took place on 12.07.2024, whereas the FIR was lodged on 14.07.2024. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He further submits that co-accused persons whose name have surfaced in the confessional statement of this petitioner have already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 45645 of 2025 and 78197 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.01.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of seven cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10376 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 A.C.J.M.-I, Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 627 of 2024.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T