Durga Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3402 of 2019 ====================================================== Durga Tiwari, wife of Om Prakash Tiwari, Resident of Village- Naraon, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary of Food and Supply Department, Bihar at Patna.
3.
The Special Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar at Patna.
4.
The Deputy Director of Food, Patna Division, Patna. 5.
The District Magistrate cum President of District Selection Committee, Kaimur at Bhabua.
6.
The Additional Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua.
7.
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Kaimur at Bhabua. 8.
The Assistant District Supply Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. 9.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. 10.
The Block Development Officer, Rampur, Block- Kaimur at Bhabua. 11.
Anil Kumar son of Ramdhwaja Ram Resident of Village- Jamuaon, Panchayat, Kohari, P.S. Bhabua, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Md. Anisul Haque, AC to AAG-5 For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-06-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that being aggrieved by the selection procedures adopted by the Selection Committee presided by the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, he has submitted an objection before the District Magistrate vide Annexure-5 to the writ application which has not been looked into as a result whereof the petitioner has moved this Court. Learned counsel submits that, in the given
Patna High Court CWJC No.3402 of 2019(2) dt.28-06-2019 2/2 facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application may be disposed off with a direction to the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua to consider his objection and take an appropriate decision thereon within a reasonable time.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the same.
In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua (respondent no.5) is hereby directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner as contained in Annexure-5 to the writ application, examine the same and pass an appropriate order thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
It goes without saying that in case the respondent no.5 proposes to pass any order adverse to the interest of the private respondent no.11, he would be under obligation to hear the respondent no.11 as well before passing such order. This writ application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U