Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6133/2020bail granted

Vikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-02Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6133 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2019 Thana- DURGAWATI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== VIKASH SINGH Son of Rabindra Singh Resident of Village-Karpura Pipara, P.S-Durgawati, District-Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 323, 342, 353, 332, 333, 337, 338, 427 and 152 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 131 of 2019, Gr. No. 994 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the FIR is against as many as 21 known and some unknown persons. There is no overt act against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is accused in one other case arising out of the same occurrence.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender before court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6133 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 131 of 2019, Gr. No. 994 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T