Anand Mohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3559 of 2023 ====================================================== Anand Mohan Singh Son of Vipin Kumar Singh, resident of village - Motnajy, Devna, P.O. - Tangha, Police Station - Sakatpur and District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

3.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Darbhanga. 4.

The Block Development Officer-cum-Block Cleanliness Officer, Tardih, Darbhanga.

5.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Thengha, Block-Tardih, Darbhanga.

6.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Thengha, Block - Tardih, Darbhanga. 7.

Sunil Yadav, Son of Ram Lakhan Yadav, resident of Village - Motnajey, Ward No. 4, Police Station - Sakatpur, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh (Ga2) Mr. Akhileshwar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That the present writ application is being filed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions for appointing the petitioner on the post of "SWACHCHHATA PARYAWEKSHAK as he is having all the essential qualification and experiences for that but due to malafide intention he has not

Patna High Court CWJC No.3559 of 2023(3) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 been selected by the Mukhiya and Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Thengha, Tardih, Darbhanga who recommended the name of one Sunil Yadav for oblique reasons though the said Sunil Yadav is not having essential qualification as well as experience for the post and/or for any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to in course of hearing of this writ application."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U