Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7727 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar S/O Nathuni Sah R/O vill.- Mohiuddinpur, P.S.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(1), 303(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has assaulted with an axe on the head of the informant's husband.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that other allegations are against other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7727 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 accused persons, and from perusal of the injury report, which is annexed at Annexure-P/2, it will transpire that the husband of the informant has received two injuries: (i) incised wound over the frontal part of the scalp measuring 1/2"x1/4"x1/3" and (ii) pain over the lower back. He further submits that the doctor has opined that the nature of the injury is simple, caused by a hard and blunt substance. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Samastipur in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T