Ganesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7424 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== 1.
Ganesh Kumar S/O Nathuni Sah R/O Vill.- Mohiuddinpur, Rajwa, P.s.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur 2.
Nathuni Sah S/O Late Santlal Sah R/O Vill.- Mohiuddinpur, Rajwa, P.s.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(1), 303(2), 308(3), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. Allegation in the first information report is that all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed by barging into the house of the informant and indulged in abuses and assault causing injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the specific allegation against petitioner no. 1 is that he inflicted a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7424 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 knife blow on the informant causing injuries on her hand, back and head while petitioner no. 2 is said to have assaulted the informant's mother-in-law with Paghariya on her head, however, the injuries of both the informant and her mother-in-law appear to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object as would be evident from the injury report annexed as Annexure-2. It has also been submitted that there is case and counter case and as a matter of fact, it was the informant side which was the real aggressors and the injuries have been sustained on the side of the petitioners also.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the injuries attributable to these petitioners are simple in nature coupled with the existence of case and counter case leading to injuries on both the sides, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7424 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 court in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T