Rajeev Mahto @ Ravi Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10856 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2125 Year-2017 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur ====================================================== Rajeev Mahto @ Ravi Mahto son of Late Pargash Mahto @ Prakash Mahto Village- DAru Bhatti Bakarganj Ps- Laheriyasarai Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Guriya Kumari D/o- Sri Prasad Mandal Vill- Ballipur Po- Darsar PsWarisnagar Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P.

Ms. Rani Shashi Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner who is husband of opposite party No. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite party No. 2.

4. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- (three thousand) per month to the opposite party No. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10856 of 2024(4) dt.18-04-2024 2/2 six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class-cum-Additional Munsif, Samastipur in connection with C.R. Case No. 2125 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:- '(1) Opposite party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party No. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.'

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T