Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7957 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== Sunil Yadav S/O Late Ramdev Yadav wrongy mentioned as Ganesh Yadav in the order Impugned ,Resident of Village- Magha Police Station- Keoti, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 109/3 (5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while the informant, who is said to be an employee at Bus Stand Road, was sitting in a tea shop, 5-6 persons arrived on two to three motorcycles and started firing indiscriminately. However, the informant somehow managed to save himself.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that in the F.I.R. itself it is stated that the informant identified one Vishal and Vicky. It is further submitted that the name of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7957 of 2026(3) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 petitioner surfaced in the confessional statement of Vishal, who has named many persons and the petitioner is among them.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the informant did not receive any injury and there is only a general and omnibus allegation of firing. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has criminal antecedents of 11 cases and he is in custody since 24.11.2025.

6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, subject to the condition that with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and remain physically present on each and every date and shall mark his weekly attendance at Keoti Police Station. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T