← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11492/2019dismissed

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11492 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2018 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR @ SUBODH KUMAR SINGH Son of Ram Tahal Singh R/o village-Dasai Baghari, P.S- Runisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi, Permanent R/o village-Shambho, P. S- Sonbarsa, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Manoj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2019 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Runisaidpur P.S.case No.177 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was working as Headmaster of Pandit Dayal High School Dashai Baghari Runisaidpur without any appointment and further appears that in view of direction of this Court in C.W.J.C. No.15130 of 2019, the enquiry was conducted by the District Magistrate with respect to his appointment and his appointment was found to be forged.

Submission of the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11492 of 2019(4) dt.19-06-2019 2/2 petitioner is that he has been appointed by the local Managing Committee and in pursuance to that he was working and there was no criminal intention against the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him.

Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that prima facie there are materials against him as in pursuance of the order of this Court, his appointment was found illegal as such he does not deserve anticipatory bail.. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner , however, if he surrenders and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and if possible to be disposed of on the same day. With the above direction, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T