Sanjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6548 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2024 Thana- ALAMNAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sanjeet Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav Resident of village -Karuwaganj ward no 01 PS -Alamnagar, Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 309 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, three unknown miscreants looted Rs. 45,050/- from the informant and fled away from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6548 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Ajay yadav and the same has got no evidentiary value. No T.I. parade has been conducted in this case. It is further submitted that no looted article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2024 and has got four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail in two cases.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 309 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T