Patna High CourtMJC/2530/2016disposed

Ashok Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary And ORS

2017-04-19The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2530 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2770 of 2012 ===========================================================

1. Ashok Kumar Singh, son of Ram Chandra Singh

2. Bijli Singh, son of Late Dharkhan Singh Both Resident of Village- Dhanhara, P.S. Sheyampur Bhatahan, DistrictSheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Raj Kumar, the District Magistrate, Sheohar

3. Sri Lalbabu Singh, the Sub Divisional Officer, Sheohar, District- Sheohar

4. Sri Manoj Kumar, the Anchal Adhikari, Dumri Katsari Anchal, DistrictSheohar. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, G.P. 26 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-04-2017 From the 4th show-cause filed by Respondent No. 1 and on a perusal of Annexures A and B appended therewith read along with the cheques (Annexure-B/1 and B/2) and the statement (Annexure-B/3) it is seen that payment of compensation after deducting the Income Tax has been undertaken and the entire amount has been paid, even though after some delay and directions issued by this Court for which apology has also been tendered. Accepting the same and finding no further indulgence to be made in the matter, the application is disposed of. In case the petitioners have any grievance with regard to the assessment made

Patna High Court MJC No.2530 of 2016 dt.19-04-2017 2/2 and the amount of compensation paid, so also the action of deducting the Income Tax, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law but now, in view of the compliance reported by the respondents, I am not inclined to proceed further in the contempt proceedings. Respondents are discharged from the proceedings and the application disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 27.04.2017 Transmission Date