← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2647/2026disposed

Ascensive Educare Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2647 of 2026 ====================================================== Ascensive Educare Ltd., a company registered under Companies Act 1956 having its registered office BF- 32, 2nd Floor, Sector- 1, Saltlake, Kolkata700064, through its authorized representative Soumitra Das, Male, age about 37 Years, Son of Ganesh Das, Resident of Chandipur, Chandipur, P.O. Chandipur, District- North 24 Parganas, West Bengal- 743247. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna- 01. 2.

The Secretary, Youth Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna- 01.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, Advocate For the State :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties

2. Following reliefs are sought for in the present application:

"(a) For issuance of Writ in nature of Certiorari quashing the Letter No.

BSDM/ Domain- 108/2025/ 2603 dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P/16) passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner Company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2647 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 (b) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioners may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed a representation vide Annexure-P/17 dated 29.12.2025 before the respondent no. 2 for redressal of its grievance.

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders, shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

6. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Ibrar//- ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T