Mitan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8190 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.
MITAN PASWAN Son of late Dharikshan Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
2.
Mintu Paswan Son of Raghuvir Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
3.
Raghuvir Paswan Son of Mitan Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
4.
Kanti Devi W/o Raghuvir Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
5.
Lakshuman Paswan Son of Mitan Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
6.
Rinki Kumari D/o Raghuvir Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
7.
Neha Kumari D/o Raghuvir Paswan Resident of Village - Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, Distt.- Sheohar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prasoon Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 304-B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of dowry death. Petitioner no. 1 is grandfather, petitioner no. 2 is younger brother, petitioner no. 3 & 4 are father and mother respectively, petitioner no. 5 is uncle and petitioner no. 6 & 7 are unmarried sisters of Gabbar Paswan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8190 of 2022(2) dt.03-08-2022 2/2 (husband of deceased).
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody and petitioners have been made accused merely because they are close relative of Gabbar Paswan. There is general and omnibus allegation. Petitioners are separate in mess & property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband.
Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Sheohar in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 70 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T