Pramila Devi v. Baliram Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2698 of 2016 ====================================================== Pramila Devi, Wife of Ram Chandra Singh, Resident of Village- Bhusahula, PS Ayar Kothal Dehri, District Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Baliram Singh, Sons of late Jagdish Singh 2.

Shyam Singh, Sons of late Jagdish Singh 3.

Srimati Devi, 4.

Rupmati Devi 5.

Kusmuni Devi 6.

Kusum Kumari All Nos. 3 to 6 are Daughters of late Jagdish Singh 7.

Most. Shanti Kuer, Wife of Jagdish Singh 8.

Geeta Kumari 9.

Savita Kumari 10.

Mamta Kumari 11.

Deepa Kumari Sl. No. 8-11 Daughters of late Jairam Singh 12.

Birendra Kumar 13.

Dhirendra Kumar@Bitu Kumar Both Sons of late Jairam Singh 14.

Suresh Singh Son of late Parikha Singh All are residents of Mohalla- Rajputana Dehri, P.O.- Dehri, PS Dehri, District Rohtas.

15.

Chandrawati Devi Wife of Deobansh Singh Resident of Villge- Katar, P.S. Indrapuri Dehri- on-Sone, District Rohtas.

16.

Ram Rawati Devi wife of Ram Jag Singh Resident of Village- Katar, P.S. Katar, P.S. Indrapuri Dehri-0n-Sone District Rohtas. 17.

Ram Jhari Devi Wife of Jagarnath Singh Resident of Village- Nirmalpur, P.S. Akorhigola, District Rohtas.

18.

Basmati Devi wife of Kamla Singh Resident of Village- Katar, P.S. Katar, P.S. Indrapuri Dehri-0n-Sone District Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akhouri Vipin Bihari Shrivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Patna High Court MJC No.2698 of 2016(3) dt.09-12-2021 2/2 ORAL ORDER 09-12-2021 The instant application stands filed for restoration of Civil Revision No. 8 of 2012, titled as Pramila Devi Vs. Baliram Singh & Ors., which stood dismissed for noncompliance of peremptory order dated 15.04.2015 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Judgment and decree passed in the year 1983 was sought to be challenged by the petitioner before the trial court, which endeavour did not find favour with the court below with the passing of the order dated 20.08.2011. The revision petition was dismissed vide peremptory order dated 15.04.2015. Record reveals that even earlier order dated 08.12.2014 was not complied with by the petitioner.

The instant application for restoration of the revision petition was filed on 26.07.2016 and no ground sufficient enough justifying the recall of the order dated 15.04.2015 is made out. Also, the delay remains unexplained. Litigation must come to an end at some stage.

As such, present application is dismissed.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) Sujit/Ashwini U