← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/325/2020dismissed

Union Of India v. Central Administrative Tribunal

2023-08-31The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.325 of 2020 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4624 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Union of India through the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (Department of All India Radio/ Doordarshan), New Delhi- 110001.

2.

The Director General, All India Radio, Akashwani Bhawan, Samasd Marg, New Delhi.

3.

The Station Director, All India Radio Patna-01. 4.

The Pay and Accounts Officer, General Pension Accounting Officer (Central Civil Pension) Ministry of Finance, Government of India TRIKOOT2 Complex, Bhikhaji Gama Place, New Delhi-110066. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Central Administrative Tribunal Patna Bench, Patna through The Registrar, Neojan Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

2.

Santosh Kumar, Son of Late Shashi Bhushan Prasad, Retired Assistant Engineer, All India Radio, Patna resident of Village and P.O. Jaitpur, P.S.- Paro, District-Vaishali.

3.

Babu Chand Singh, Son of Late Chhotu Singh, retired Assistant Engineer, All India Radio, Patna, resident of Village Telta Mai, P.O. and P.s. Ekangarsarai, Via Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anshay Bahadur Mathur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 31-08-2023 The present application is filed for restoration of an application filed for restoration, which was dismissed for nonprosecution.

2. The original order stood dismissed for default of partial non-compliance of the order dated 05.03.2008.

Patna High Court MJC No.325 of 2020(2) dt.31-08-2023 2/2 Subsequently, the MJC was filed for restoration of the said order. However, the same was not prosecuted and it got dismissed.

3. We find absolutely no reason to entertain the application and dismiss the same.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Anushka/- U