Bhagya Narayan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2429 of 2017 ====================================================== Bhagya Narayan Prasad, Son of Sri Chandradeo Prasad, resident of village - Fultakiya, Police Station - Kesariya, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Chairman, Senior Secondary Board, Bihar, Patna

4. The Principal, Bachcha Prasad Singh Inter College, Kesariya, District East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Vide order dated 15.11.2017 the respondents were directed to file counter affidavit but the respondents have not filed any counter affidavit.

The grievance of the petitioner relates to payment of the amount out of the fund received from the State Government pursuant to the policy decision of the State Government. The petitioner is working in Inter College affiliated to the Bihar School Examination Board under the Affiliation Regulation, 2011as amended from time to time, there is a forum for redressal of grievance pertaining to allocation of fund

Patna High Court CWJC No.2429 of 2017(3) dt.15-02-2018 2/2 and its distribution to the teachers and non-teaching staff of the college. Now the forum is functional and as such the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the forum constituted under the Affiliation Regulation, 2011 amended from time to time. In case the petitioner files such an appeal within a period of one month from today the forum shall examine the claim of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law after condoning the delay in filing the appeal as the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before the writ court.

It goes without saying that the appellate forum will dispose of the appeal expeditiously.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U