Ram Sharan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42584 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2011 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Ram Sharan Chaudhary Son of Late Jugeshwar Chaudhary @ Jamadar Chauhary, Resident of Village + P.O. - Bijhrauli, P.S.-Tisiauta, Dist.- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prashant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03/ 10-02-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.08.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 452, 323, 342, 427, 436, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that the informant Harendra Prasad and his elder brother Suresh Prasad Singh were married with the own two sisters and hence, there was dispute with regard to the gift made by the mother-in-law in favour of the wife of the informant for which 144, 145 and 188 Cr.P.C. proceedings were initiated and title suit was also filed. On the alleged date of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42584 of 2014 (03) dt.10-02-2015 2/2 occurrence the accused persons put the tractor of the informant on fire and informant's minor daughter Gunja was thrown on the burnt tractor. The accusation of throwing victim is against seven accused persons, out of them Jambant Chaudhary and Arisudan Chaudhary have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 3539 of 2014 and 8098 of 2012.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that admittedly the informant is not an eye witness to the throwing of the victim on the burning tractor. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the fact that other similarly situated accused persons have been granted bail, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 80 of 2011.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T