← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13937/2016dismissed

New Managing Committee, Madarsa Madarsatul Quran v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-12-09Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13937 of 2016 =========================================================== New Managing Committee, Madarsa Madarsatul Quran, Danapur, Bahichakutti, Madarsa No.473 through its Secretary Abdur Rahman, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Shafiqul Haque, Resident of Village- Bahichakutti, P.O. Garngihat, P.S. Kochadhaman, District-Kishanganj.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director (Higher Education), Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Special Secretary (Secondary Education), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Bihar State Madarsa Eduation Board through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj.

6. The District Education Officer, Kishanganj.

7. Maulala Abdul Bari, Secretary, Old Managing Committee, Madarsa Madrasatul Quran, Bahichakutti, Gangihat (Madarsa No. 473).

8. The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna.

9. The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. JITENDRA KR. ROY NO. 1- SC13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-12-2016 Since Annexure-7, dated 17.01.2013 has now been passed by the Full Board, therefore, the remedy for the petitioner would be to assail the said decision before the appellate authority. No interference is warranted in writ jurisdiction with the impugned order

Patna High Court CWJC No.13937 of 2016 dt.09-12-2016 2 / 2 at this juncture.

2. Writ is dismissed with liberty as above. The question of limitation will be considered keeping in mind the pendency of the writ application as well.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 13.12.2016 Transmission Date NA