← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15676/2025dismissed

Jai Prakash Narayan @ Jai Prakash Narayan Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15676 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-701 Year-2024 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Jai Prakash Narayan @ Jai Prakash Narayan Tiwari S/O Sri Dwarika Prasad Resident of Village-Nokha, PS-Nokha. District-Rohtas, at present resident of Mohalla-Babu Bazar, Ara, PS-Ara Town, District-Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Avinash Chandra Tiwari son of Satendra Nath Tiwari Resident of Village and Post-Chandwa, PS-Ara Nawada, District-Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara in A.B.P. No. 2797 of 2024.

3. Perused the records.

4. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15676 of 2025(2) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

6. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance. (Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T