Shiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3435 of 2019 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Singh, aged about 57 years, Male, Son of Late Sriram Singh Resident of Village- Diwan Ke Barkagaon, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, Directorate of Agriculture, Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Magistrate, Buxar 4.

The District Agriculture Officer, Buxar 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Buxar 6.

The Sub-Divisional Agriculture Officer, Buxar 7.

The Block Agriculture Officer, Itarhi, Buxar 8.

The Block Supply Officer, Itarhi, Buxar 9.

The Nodal Officer, Rastriya Krishi Vikash Yojna, Agriculture Department, Bihar, Bikash Bhawan, Patna 10.

Uma Devi Wife of Murli Pratap Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Diwan Ke Barlagaon, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar 11.

Murli Pratap Singh Son of Late Surya Narayan Singh Resident of Village and P.O.- Diwan Ke Barlagaon, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar 12.

Swati Mehta Wife of Anant Abhinav Resident of Village and P.O.- Diwan Ke Barlagaon, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 30-07-2019 Some kind of financial mismanagement was alleged against the private respondent in respect of subsidy given to them under the Scheme of the State Government. Although the stand of the State is that no such irregularity was committed

Patna High Court CWJC No.3435 of 2019(4) dt.30-07-2019 2/2 and that whatever subsidy given was in terms of the Scheme itself and the same stand is also voiced by the private respondent who has appeared through counsel, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner informs that some kind of enquiry is going on in respect of alteration in the godowns made by these beneficiaries but which information does not persuade us to keep this writ petition pending because the allegation of financial irregularities is answered by the counter affidavit filed and not contested.

We dispose of the writ petition accordingly.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U