Raju Chaudhary @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7913 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2022 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Raju Chaudhary @ Raju Kumar Son of Sri Jitendra Chaudhary R/v- Madan Bigha, P.S.- Cherki, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section-30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 30 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case as he is said to be owner of the motorcycle, in question. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 30 liters wine is recovered from the motorcycle in question. The motorcycle, in question was given by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7913 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 petitioner to his co-villager for his personal use. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13-04-2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Cr. Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar.) On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Gaya in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 371 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T