Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7872 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2020 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== BABLOO KUMAR SON OF SHIV DUTT KUMAR RESIDENT OFFROZEN SEMEN BANK, P.O.-B.V COLLEGE, P.S- AIRPORT, DISTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that vide letter no. 2613 dated 11.11.2019, the present FIR has been instituted against the petitioner with an allegation that he submitted forged document for obtaining the job of Switch Board Operator in Electricity Power Unit, Sampatchak.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7872 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is also submitted that petitioner was made to resign from the job by the authority, it is thus submitted that the person, who had obtained job based on forged and fabricated document, can he be allowed to resign by the authority rather his appointment ought to have been terminated by a sigmatic order, this clearly demonstrates that petitioner was made a scapegoat as prior to seeking his resignation he was not given any opportunity even to show cause for explaining his side of the story, the learned counsel next submits that petitioner has already suffered, as aforesaid. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7872 of 2022(2) dt.01-09-2022 3/3 Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 163 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T