← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2860/2020disposed

Shatrughan Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-14Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2860 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Shatrughan Tiwary Son of Late Ram Kishun Tiwari, Resident of VillageAmra, Police Station- Parasi, District- Arwal. 2.

Ishwar Dayal Pandey, Son of Late Ram Nagina Pandey, Resident of VillageMakundpur, Police Station- Dinara, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Engineer-in-Chief Middle, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dehri-On-Sone, Sasaram at Rohtas.

4.

The Superintending Engineer, Design Circle, Indrapuri, Dehri-on-Sone, Sasaram at Rohtas.

5.

The Executive Engineer, Planning and Monitoring Division, Dehri-On-Sone, Sasaram at Rohtas.

6.

The Executive Engineer/Deputy Director, Exality Control Divison, DehriOn-Sone, Sasaram at Rohtas. 7.

The Executive Engineer, Design Division, Dehri-On-Sone, Sasaram at Rohtas.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-09-2023 Heard the parties.

2 The petitioners have approached this Court with a simple prayer to dispose of their representation dated 05.08.2019 preferred before respondent No 3, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas at Sasaram.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2860 of 2020(2) dt.14-09-2023 2/2 3 Learned State Counsel submits that there has been inordinate delay in approaching the respondent-authorities. 4 Any representation, that has been preferred, needs to be disposed of and whatever is being submitted before this Court can be incorporated in the said order.

5 In that view of the matter, respondent No 3 shall be duty bound to pass an order as the representation (Annexure 6 to the petition) shows that the office has given acknowledgment on 05.08.2019.

6 If necessary, the petitioners will be filing a fresh representation along with this order within four weeks from today. In that case, respondent No 3 shall be passing an order at the earliest.

7 The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajiv Roy, J) M.E.H./- U