Ranjeet Sharma @ Ranjeet Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7028 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2018 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RANJEET SHARMA @ RANJEET KUMAR SHARMA S/o Ram Briksh Sharma Village- Doghra Vishar Chawk, P.S- Jalley, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shambhu Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 456/341/323/354(A)/354(B)504/506 IPC registered in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 163 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of money dispute and for which the petitioner's side has also filed Complaint Case bearing C.R. No. 1525 of 2018 (Annexure-2). There is inordinate delay in instituting the FIR on 27.10.2018 for the alleged occurrence of 17.10.2018. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VI, Darbhanga, in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 163 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7028 of 2019(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T